PM Modi Mesmerizes United Nations & Indian Diaspora
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured his position as not only as a global leader but also as a statesman in the comity of nations during his 7-day successful trip to the United States of America which concluded on September 27,2019.First at the Howdy Modi event at Houston and then in the United Nations General Assembly representing 193 nations with The Holy See and Palestine as Associate Members , Modi unfolded his world vision-a pollution free ecosystem and inclusive growth not hindered by terrorism a well as mutual and trilateral cooperation .Hence, India has reason to be miffed when his counterpart of Pakistan Imran Khan Niazi misusing the precinct of the world body for abusing its immediate neighbour listing out innuendo for the violation of human rights in Kashmir Valley following abolition of the special statue status enjoyed by Jammu & Kashmir for 70 years and integrating with the rest of The Union of India. India is also right for slamming Imran Khan for twisting the happenings in Jammu & Kashmir following the withdrawal of the special status .PM Khan has made a Kashmir centric speech at the General Assembly.Excercising the right to reply within 24 hours of Pakistan PM Khans’ uncalled for accusation. India reminded Islamabad saying Indian nationals do not need any spokesperson to speak on their behalf and “least of all those who have built an industry of terrorism from the ideology of hate. Khan should introspect whether his maiden speech at the 74th UN General Assembly debate should have been devoted entirely to lash out at its immediate neighbour. Understandably, Team Imran Khan is under pressure from their political opponents and the populace for not delivering the electoral commitments. Masses are suffering in the country which is according to PM Khan has gone bankrupt and most of the international financial institutions are not inclined to bail out the country. Should he therefore not have made efforts to convince the world leaders about the difficult times his country passing through and attract investment? He is digging his political grave by directing all energy and exhausting his country’s exchequer by sticking to only one point agenda to internationalize Kashmir issue knowing that that his predecessors remained committed that Kashmir is a bilateral issue between New Delhi and Pakistan .The outcome of his meet with POTUS Donald John Trump is fruitless as he has reminded him that IF India and Pakistan agree he is ready to play the role of a intermediary. What is the next course of action he is likely to take up post his failure to mobilize most of the nations for dancing to his tune on Kashmir issue as New Delhi iterates saying it is a bilateral matter? His narrative is intended to foster divisiveness at the United Nations. Attempts to sharpen differences and stir up hatred are simply put – ‘hate speech” as New Delhi’s Spokesperson Vidisha Maitra told UNGA .Rarely has the General Assembly witnessed such “misuse, rather abuse”, of an opportunity to reflect.”Words matter in diplomacy. Invocation of phrases such as “pogrom”, “bloodbath”, “racial superiority”, “pick up the gun” and “fight to the end” reflect a medieval mindset and not a 21st century vision.””Pogroms, Prime Minister Imran Khan Niazi, are not a phenomenon of today’s vibrant democracies,” she said.”India is justified in suggesting to Pak PM to refresh his rather sketchy understanding of history. Do not forget the gruesome genocide perpetrated by Pakistan against its own people in 1971 and the role played by Lt. Gen A A K Niazi. A sordid fact that the Hon’ble Prime Minister of Bangladesh reminded this Assembly about earlier this afternoon.”Maitra said Khan’s “threat of unleashing nuclear devastation qualifies as brinksmanship, not statesmanship.””Even coming from the leader of a country that has monopolised the entire value chain of the industry of terrorism, Prime Minister Khan’s justification of terrorism was brazen and incendiary,” she said rightly. Is it too late for the cricketer turned politician and the vested interests backing him to appreciate that jingoism is antithesis to the civilized world and no nation can make an iota of socio-economic advancement amidst unabated terrorism.